Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Arizona

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place

Yuma, AZ · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade B.

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place: 1.8 TCR = 64% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place safety composite

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2017

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place injury rate improved

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Yuma, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/47
  • PHOTO California Commercia…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Commercial Solar, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place averages 1.8 TCR (64% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.8

Where NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 47 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Arizona.

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place (36 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place
NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place (36 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NA-US-AZ-Yuma-East 33rd Place has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.6 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · AZ · Yuma

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Commercial Solar, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S. King_Potelco 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berry-It Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brink Constructors, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verde River Growers, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynapac Harvesting, Inc. (AZ) 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Todd Whittaker Drywall Inc 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR 0403 - Brooklyn-Hamilton, NY 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Federal Mogul Motorparts - Boaz 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Little Rock Operations Center AK6H 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3132 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE C.L. Smith Industrial Company 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pannell Industries, Inc. Dallas-Fort Worth District 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0055 - El Paso, Tx 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 48- Ladd (Cattani) 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.