General Warehousing and Storage · California

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution

Newark, CA · ~77 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution: 2.7 TCR = 47% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution safety composite

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2021

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution injury rate improved

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Newark, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #365/1131
  • PHOTO MLW - OCC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MLW - OCC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution averages 2.7 TCR (47% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution TCR series: 2017=6.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.2 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.8

Where NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #365 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution (77 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution
NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution (77 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

NA-US-CA-Newark-Parts Distribution has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2017 6.4 3.2 0 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Newark

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 92 employers in Newark, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MLW - OCC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Systems, Inc 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2929 S. Hardy Drive 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HealthTrust - Richmond Supply Chain - va 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Innovative Produce, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bokisch Vineyard Management 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bassman 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE COR Chico Business Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 627 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lucid Motors HQ 2,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : OAK5 2,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OAK5 1,865 FTE
NAT-TCR CCNA-Paw Paw 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Power & Lighting, LLC - 230 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maples Industries Plant Four Location 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake City Office 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sharmar Village Care Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMMK Dock Support 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Denver Lakewood 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.