Solar Construction and Design · California

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Solar Construction and Design workplace, earning a grade D.

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street: 4.9 TCR = 176% of Solar Construction and Design BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street safety composite

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2018

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street injury rate improved

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.6 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.6 · 2018=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · San Luis Obispo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 176% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #103/147
  • PHOTO WIRELESS INFRASTRUCT…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street averages 4.9 TCR (176% of the Solar Construction and Design BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street falls in its industry

1,605 Solar Construction and Design establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 147 Solar Construction and Design employers in California.

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street (39 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street
NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street (39 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NA-US-CA-San Luis Obispo-Archer Street has fewer employees than the Solar Construction and Design median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2017 6.6 4.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · San Luis Obispo

1,605 Solar Construction and Design employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TB Flats Wind 18141013 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SGT:SG002 - SG002-Sage-Ft. Collins, CO 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANS:ANATH - ANATH-Gainesville, GA 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Felipe Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Brothers Farms 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE TLC Custom Farming Company LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonoma Valley Vineyards 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR VTI 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR UGN-Jackson 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Perforex Forest Services 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sales - Kona 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE JBF Stainless LLC 148 Industrial Park Dr Frankfort NY 13340 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penske : 4823-00 Closetmaid/Ocala, FL 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brabazon Green Bay 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ngl Water Solutions, LLC-Orla 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.