Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing · Illinois

Nal Paris Plant

Paris, IL · ~1,371 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nal Paris Plant runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Nal Paris Plant: 3.5 TCR = 64% of Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nal Paris Plant safety composite

Nal Paris Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nal Paris Plant: 3.3 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Nal Paris Plant's TCR rose 0.6 from 3.3 in 2021 to 3.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Paris, IL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 64% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO UQM Technologies, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 193 inj
  • SIZE ~1,371 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UQM Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Nal Paris Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nal Paris Plant averages 3.5 TCR (64% of the Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nal Paris Plant TCR series: 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Nal Paris Plant falls in its industry

216 Motor Vehicle Electrical and E establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Motor Vehicle Electrical and E employers in Illinois.

Nal Paris Plant (1,371 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nal Paris Plant
Nal Paris Plant (1,371 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Nal Paris Plant has more employees than the Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 2.2 54 0 0
2023 3.5 2.0 59 0 0
2022 3.2 1.9 46 5 0
2021 3.3 1.4 34 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · IL · Paris

216 Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 41 employers in Paris, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UQM Technologies, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warren NRR Plant 11 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HI-LEX Litchfield (HCIC) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Mitsuba Corporation/Michigan 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swedish American Health System Plaza - 4819 1,370 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 1,368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deerfield, IL -Medical Products 1,374 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Elizabeth's Hospital, OFallon 1,376 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Lighting - Paris 1,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horizon Health Hospital Medical Foundation of Paris Inc 767 FTE
CITY-NEAR Simonton Windows 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAL CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 284 FTE
NAT-TCR Wesley Towers, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR West Jefferson Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Sheboygan WI - VPI Corp 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United Warehouse Company Tulsa 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Overland Park Regional Medical Center 1,371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alcon Johns Creek Manufacturing 1,371 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medtronic Sofamor Danek-Pyramid 1,371 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCarran International Airport 1,371 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.