Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors · Pennsylvania

NAPA Development Corp, Inc.

Pen Argyl, PA · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

NAPA Development Corp, Inc.: 7.1 TCR = 253% of Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. safety composite

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

7/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NAPA Development Corp, Inc.: 4.9 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 14.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

NAPA Development Corp, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.3 from 4.9 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Pen Argyl, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 253% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #107/115
  • PHOTO District Contractors…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: District Contractors Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NAPA Development Corp, Inc. averages 7.1 TCR (253% of the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=14 · 2020=4.7 · 2022=7.1 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 2.8

Where NAPA Development Corp, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or la establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 115 Excavating, earthmoving, or la employers in Pennsylvania.

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NAPA Development Corp, Inc.
NAPA Development Corp, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

NAPA Development Corp, Inc. has fewer employees than the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 6.1 2 1 0
2022 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2020 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 14.0 11.6 6 0 1
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 4.9 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · PA · Pen Argyl

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 13 employers in Pen Argyl, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR District Contractors Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Engineering & Construction Corp 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knochel Bros Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ray Labbe & Sons Inc 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sylvan PA 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monterey Mushrooms, LLC.- Temple, PA 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boyer Nurseries & Orchards, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. (Shipping) 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03011 - Grand Central Sanitation 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR 164 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pen Argyl Plant 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pen Argyl 009 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Iowa Electric Cooperative 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KW Electric Inc. - Cedar Falls 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR La-Z-Boy Northeast Distribution Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rocky Mount Rehabilitation Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE IN - Shoals 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administration and sales 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jayhawk Plant 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Velocity Byesville 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.