Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Illinois

Naperville Fire Department

Naperville, IL · ~207 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Naperville Fire Department runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade F.

Naperville Fire Department: 6.6 TCR = 207% of Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Naperville Fire Department safety composite

Naperville Fire Department scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Naperville Fire Department: 4.3 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.56× in 2024

Naperville Fire Department's TCR rose 6.9 from 4.3 in 2020 to 11.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Naperville, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 207% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #69/262
  • PHOTO Fire Department - Ma…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~207 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fire Department - Main Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Naperville Fire Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Naperville Fire Department averages 6.6 TCR (207% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Naperville Fire Department TCR series: 2020=4.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Naperville Fire Department falls in its industry

793 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 262 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Illinois.

Naperville Fire Department (207 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Naperville Fire Department
Naperville Fire Department (207 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Naperville Fire Department has more employees than the Fire departments (e.g., government, volu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 10.3 24 2 0
2023 4.5 3.6 7 3 0
2022 6.3 6.3 14 0 0
2021 6.8 5.9 15 1 0
2020 4.3 4.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Naperville

793 Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 241 employers in Naperville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fire Department - Main Station 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ankeny Fire Department 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Germantown Hills Fire Protection District 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2065-Farmer City, IL 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenbard 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chicago - Pezza 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cresco Labs - Joliet 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 3,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naperville Ill 1,349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naperville Research Center 862 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2884 Cor3010 855 FTE
NAT-TCR Southwest Glass & Glazing, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Landoll Company, LLC - Travalong 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncf Cim 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LMMM Dallas #43, LTD. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Bonded Warehouse Corportation 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Promotions 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10217 West Hartford 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&F Machine Co., Inc 207 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.