Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

NAPP Reading Power

Reading, PA · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NAPP Reading Power runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

NAPP Reading Power: 11.8 TCR = 358% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NAPP Reading Power safety composite

NAPP Reading Power scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2016→2017

NAPP Reading Power injury rate improved

NAPP Reading Power's TCR fell 10.4 from 17.1 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.1 · 2017=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 358% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #80/81
  • PHOTO CSC Missouri
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSC Missouri (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

NAPP Reading Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NAPP Reading Power averages 11.8 TCR (358% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NAPP Reading Power TCR series: 2016=17.1 · 2017=6.6 · BLS 3.3

Where NAPP Reading Power falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 81 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Pennsylvania.

NAPP Reading Power (38 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NAPP Reading Power
NAPP Reading Power (38 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

NAPP Reading Power has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 6.6 6.6 3 0 0
2016 17.1 12.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Reading

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSC Missouri 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Container Corp 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signode Multi Wall - Taylor 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chickasaw Container Corporation 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - M&J Facility 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dairy 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc - Elizabethtown 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Risser's Poultry Handling Services, LLC 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Concepts 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 7865 N 100 E 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Semco Assembly Plant 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4588 Rohnert Park, C 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE RailWorks Transit 2nd Avenue 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Bloomfield LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyline Surgery Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.