Plastics coating of textiles and apparel · Massachusetts

National Coating Corporation

Rockland, MA · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

National Coating Corporation runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plastics coating of textiles and apparel workplace, earning a grade D.

National Coating Corporation: 4.5 TCR = 137% of Plastics coating of textiles and apparel BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

National Coating Corporation safety composite

National Coating Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2019→2024

National Coating Corporation injury rate improved

National Coating Corporation's TCR fell 6.7 from 10.1 in 2019 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313320 · Rockland, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 137% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #3/10
  • PHOTO Petersburgh
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Petersburgh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

National Coating Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows National Coating Corporation averages 4.5 TCR (137% of the Plastics coating of textiles and apparel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

National Coating Corporation TCR series: 2019=10.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=10.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where National Coating Corporation falls in its industry

79 Plastics coating of textiles a establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 10 Plastics coating of textiles a employers in Massachusetts.

National Coating Corporation (35 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate National Coating Corporation
National Coating Corporation (35 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.5

National Coating Corporation has fewer employees than the Plastics coating of textiles and apparel median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.8 10.8 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.1 10.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313320 · MA · Rockland

79 Plastics coating of textiles and apparel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 30 employers in Rockland, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Petersburgh 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barrday Composite Solutions 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Junction 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toray Advanced Composites 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ethos Fitchburg 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Resinate, Inc. - Worcester 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS - MA 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Systems, Inc. NE 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR EMD Serono, Inc. Rockland 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Shore Health Home Care Division 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockland 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Restoration 168 FTE
NAT-TCR DLC Resources 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Coke United_AL 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wapsie Pines Lawn Care & Landscaping, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Holladay Property Services Midwest Inc. HQ 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turf Star, Inc- Brea 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE WA Trucking - Aberdeen 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Putnam County Emergency Medical Services 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Clean Hazardous Waste Removal, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.