Coils for motors and generators manufacturing · Texas

National Electric Coil

Brownsville, TX · ~237 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

National Electric Coil runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Coils for motors and generators manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

National Electric Coil: 3.3 TCR = 98% of Coils for motors and generators manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

National Electric Coil safety composite

National Electric Coil scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

National Electric Coil: 0.8 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

National Electric Coil's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.8 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Brownsville, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 98% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #14/17
  • PHOTO Electro Motor, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electro Motor, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

National Electric Coil in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows National Electric Coil averages 3.3 TCR (98% of the Coils for motors and generators manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

National Electric Coil TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where National Electric Coil falls in its industry

222 Coils for motors and generator establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 17 Coils for motors and generator employers in Texas.

National Electric Coil (237 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate National Electric Coil
National Electric Coil (237 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

National Electric Coil has more employees than the Coils for motors and generators manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.3 10 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 13 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 10 1 0
2021 2.7 2.7 6 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 7 0 0
2019 4.8 4.3 10 1 0
2018 4.1 4.1 8 1 0
2017 2.4 2.4 5 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · TX · Brownsville

222 Coils for motors and generators manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 155 employers in Brownsville, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electro Motor, Inc 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kohler Company 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Electric Motors 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bodine Electric Company 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wharton County Foods, LLC. 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE ParkUSA 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE NTACT CONSTRUCTORS, LTD. 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE JMEG, LLC - Austin 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brownsville, TX 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-769 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Valley Regional Medical Center 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Regional Medical Center 759 FTE
NAT-TCR BKG Company, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NA-US-OR-Portland-NE 112th Avenue 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FRANKFORT 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Atrium Medical Center 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Office 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE World Pet Care 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Cleveland, LLC (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - Cleveland Fairhill) 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Electric Company 237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.