Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing · Minnesota

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park: 8.7 TCR = 264% of Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park safety composite

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park: 0.0 → 26.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 26.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park's TCR rose 26.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 26.1 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339920 · Brooklyn Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 264% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO QubicaAMF Pins Divis…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QubicaAMF Pins Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park averages 8.7 TCR (264% of the Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=26.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park falls in its industry

197 Sporting goods (except ammunit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Sporting goods (except ammunit employers in Minnesota.

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park (50 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park
Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park (50 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Nautilus, Inc. - Brooklyn Park has fewer employees than the Sporting goods (except ammunition, cloth median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 26.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339920 · MN · Brooklyn Park

197 Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QubicaAMF Pins Division 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Z-man Fishing Products 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Werner Paddles 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mervin Manufacturing 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meadow Star 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louriston 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Dublin 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center-UB 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Knouse Foods Coop, Inc - Peach Glen 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MRF Oakland Wood 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2296 - Laguna Hills 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Holiday Inn Airport 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rossburg 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elliott Aviation DSM 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henick-Lane Inc. Office 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance Industrial Maintenance & Machine, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.