Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential · California

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc

Concord, CA · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential workplace, earning a grade D.

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc: 5.0 TCR = 131% of Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc safety composite

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc: 3.7 → 15.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.6 TCR · DART/TCR 3.13× in 2024

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc's TCR rose 12.0 from 3.7 in 2017 to 15.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · Concord, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 131% of ind

  • DART 15.6 DART
  • RANK #29/78
  • PHOTO Des Moines Office
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Des Moines Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ned Clyde Construction, Inc averages 5.0 TCR (131% of the Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=3.8 · 2024=15.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Ned Clyde Construction, Inc falls in its industry

698 Remodeling and renovating gene establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 78 Remodeling and renovating gene employers in California.

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc (27 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ned Clyde Construction, Inc
Ned Clyde Construction, Inc (27 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Ned Clyde Construction, Inc has fewer employees than the Remodeling and renovating general contra median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.6 15.6 4 0 0
2022 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · CA · Concord

698 Remodeling and renovating general contractors, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 201 employers in Concord, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Des Moines Office 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galloway Roofing 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renovations Delivered LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOSS ROOFING-SIDING EXPERTS, INC 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-01 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 403 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gonsalves and Santucci 1,551 FTE
NAT-TCR MTS Byron Center 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Innovative Builders of Alexandria, Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tropar 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Baltimore,MD-5901 Chemical 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology-ED 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Hvc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moorhead Clinic 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intex Corporation 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.