Chemical industries machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

Nederman Corporation

Charlotte, NC · ~46 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nederman Corporation runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chemical industries machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Nederman Corporation: 1.2 TCR = 53% of Chemical industries machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nederman Corporation safety composite

Nederman Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nederman Corporation: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.67× in 2024

Nederman Corporation's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.2 · 53% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #5/35
  • PHOTO M&L - Baton Rouge
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M&L - Baton Rouge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Nederman Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nederman Corporation averages 1.2 TCR (53% of the Chemical industries machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nederman Corporation TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Nederman Corporation falls in its industry

911 Chemical industries machinery establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 35 Chemical industries machinery employers in North Carolina.

Nederman Corporation (46 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Nederman Corporation
Nederman Corporation (46 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Nederman Corporation has more employees than the Chemical industries machinery and equipm median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · NC · Charlotte

911 Chemical industries machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M&L - Baton Rouge 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydrotech - Cincinnati 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WCAT OKC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Service Center 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrells Facility 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buck Steam Station 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE KITTY HAWK AREA 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR RK Mechanical, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dot Transportation, Inc. Bear, Delaware 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - XMS2 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bella Construction of Key West, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stryker-JR Runnemede NJ 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stryker JR- Woodale, IL 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE KDLA State Library 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 717 Logistics LLC 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.