Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing · South Carolina

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods

Gaffney, SC · ~1,103 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods safety composite

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods held a steady TCR band

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311412 · Gaffney, SC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO US PL Medford
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~1,103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US PL Medford (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods falls in its industry

274 Frozen food entrees (except se establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Frozen food entrees (except se employers in South Carolina.

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods (1,103 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 201 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods
Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods (1,103 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 201 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods has more employees than the Frozen food entrees (except seafood base median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.8 0.4 8 0 0
2020 0.7 0.1 3 5 0
2019 0.5 0.0 2 3 0
2018 0.4 0.1 3 1 0
2016 0.7 0.1 4 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311412 · SC · Gaffney

274 Frozen food entrees (except seafood based), packaged, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 68 employers in Gaffney, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US PL Medford 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle Pizza Co. - Little Chute 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle Springville Factory 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle Prepared Foods 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michelin Americas Research Center - MARC 1,101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Hill Distribution Center RHDC 1,107 FTE
STATE-SIZE US3 - Spartanburg Plant 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA, Inc. 1,019 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCCC-- Main 929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaffney 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 638 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Byers D.C. Detroit Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Clean Harbors Industrial Services Inc 84YIW 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Seattle Outpatient 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-19000) 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Brooks Ave 1500 1,103 FTE
NAT-SIZE 123569-North Metro Ga P&Dc 1,103 FTE
NAT-SIZE DB Schenker--Carlisle 1,103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cthar - Hartford 1,103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.