Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services · Ohio

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC)

Dublin, OH · ~222 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services workplace, earning a grade C.

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC): 0.5 TCR = 92% of Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) safety composite

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) held a steady TCR band

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2018=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Dublin, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.5 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO US SL NQAC Dublin
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US SL NQAC Dublin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) averages 0.5 TCR (92% of the Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2018=0.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) falls in its industry

232 Laboratory testing (except med establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Laboratory testing (except med employers in Ohio.

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) (222 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC)
Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) (222 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Nestle Quality Assurance Center (NQAC) has more employees than the Laboratory testing (except medical, vete median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.5 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · OH · Dublin

232 Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 170 employers in Dublin, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US SL NQAC Dublin 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baker Hughes, a GE Company - Ginn Center 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BASF Corporation Southfield 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLY 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wagner Industrial Electric 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shearer's Foods - Corporate 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle LJ Minor 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCL Design Strongsville 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health South Campus 2,093 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 1,895 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dublin Methodist Hospital 1,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR OCLC, Inc. 824 FTE
NAT-TCR Avenel Site 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Matagorda Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Station 12 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Holian Asbestos Removal 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allied Corporate Services 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palm Beach Resource Recovery Corporation 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manor Care Health Services - Wallingford 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwich (HR) 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.