Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · New Jersey

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc.

Fairfield, NJ · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc.: 4.3 TCR = 131% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. safety composite

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2022→2024

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. injury rate improved

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 3.3 from 4.7 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.7 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Fairfield, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 131% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #10/24
  • PHOTO LV Thompson Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LV Thompson Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. averages 4.3 TCR (131% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. TCR series: 2022=4.7 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 24 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in New Jersey.

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. (52 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc.
New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. (52 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

New Age Metal Fabricating Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · NJ · Fairfield

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fairfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LV Thompson Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems, LLC - North Aurora 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryan Metal Products, Inc. DBA Stor-Loc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EBP 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lynmar Builders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Medical Construction 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jocama Construction Corp 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied telecom corp 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand AV Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1175 - Fairfield 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weiss-Aug Surgical Products 241 FTE
NAT-TCR Ranews East Moline 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Jewel 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheltair Aviation MLB 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Saticoy Lemon Association - Oxnard 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE VA Express Logistics LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Done Service Group 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Down to Earth Pearlridge 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baytown Service Center 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.