Child welfare services · California

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation

Chula Vista, CA · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Child welfare services workplace, earning a grade D.

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation: 4.6 TCR = 121% of Child welfare services BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation safety composite

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.8

2018→2024

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation injury rate improved

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation's TCR fell 12.8 from 12.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 19.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.8 · 2019=19.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624110 · Chula Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/53
  • PHOTO Jewish Community Cen…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jewish Community Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation averages 4.6 TCR (121% of the Child welfare services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation TCR series: 2018=12.8 · 2019=19.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation falls in its industry

328 Child welfare services establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 53 Child welfare services employers in California.

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation (22 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation
New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation (22 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3

New Alternatives, Inc - Family Visitation has fewer employees than the Child welfare services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 19.5 4.9 4 0 0
2018 12.8 8.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624110 · CA · Chula Vista

328 Child welfare services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jewish Community Center 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leisure Services Dept 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Youth House 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR O'Fallon 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR Tamura Superette, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Children's Hospital-The Woodlands 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at East Haven Public Schools 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Barrday Composite Solutions 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Viking Plastics - Huntsville 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Station 2 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. Norcross 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston, SC 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.