Dies and taps (i.e., a machine tool accessory) manufacturing · Michigan

New Center Stamping, Inc.

Detroit, MI · ~183 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Center Stamping, Inc. runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Dies and taps (i.e., a machine tool accessory) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

New Center Stamping, Inc.: 5.4 TCR = 162% of Dies and taps (i.e., a machine tool accessory) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Center Stamping, Inc. safety composite

New Center Stamping, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2016→2024

New Center Stamping, Inc. injury rate improved

New Center Stamping, Inc.'s TCR fell 10.4 from 11.4 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2017=8.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333515 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #36/40
  • PHOTO NATC LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NATC LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

New Center Stamping, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Center Stamping, Inc. averages 5.4 TCR (162% of the Dies and taps (i.e., a machine tool accessory) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Center Stamping, Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2017=8.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where New Center Stamping, Inc. falls in its industry

221 Dies and taps (i.e., a machine establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 40 Dies and taps (i.e., a machine employers in Michigan.

New Center Stamping, Inc. (183 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate New Center Stamping, Inc.
New Center Stamping, Inc. (183 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5

New Center Stamping, Inc. has more employees than the Dies and taps (i.e., a machine tool acce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 5.3 3.5 4 2 0
2022 2.4 1.9 5 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 7 0 0
2017 8.7 7.1 22 0 0
2016 11.4 7.3 28 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333515 · MI · Detroit

221 Dies and taps (i.e., a machine tool accessory) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NATC LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ME02-COR-CORNISH 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DRILLMEC INC. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Melfred Borzall, Inc. 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms LLC 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wyoming Manufacturing Facility - KNA 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lear Corporation - Farwell 183 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Jordan Plastics Beaverton 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon Retail LLC - MAB4 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bop LLC - Msn4 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Men's Resource Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedras 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE St Martha Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Church & Dwight Colonial Heights 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adolphus 183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jindal Pipe USA Inc. 183 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.