Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Connecticut

New England Plasma Development Corp.

Putnam, CT · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New England Plasma Development Corp. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

New England Plasma Development Corp.: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New England Plasma Development Corp. safety composite

New England Plasma Development Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

New England Plasma Development Corp.: 0.0 → 19.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 19.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

New England Plasma Development Corp.'s TCR rose 19.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 19.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Putnam, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #11/13
  • PHOTO KVF Quad Corporation
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KVF Quad Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

New England Plasma Development Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New England Plasma Development Corp. averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New England Plasma Development Corp. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=19.9 · BLS 3.3

Where New England Plasma Development Corp. falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Connecticut.

New England Plasma Development Corp. (33 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate New England Plasma Development Corp.
New England Plasma Development Corp. (33 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

New England Plasma Development Corp. has fewer employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.9 7.9 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · CT · Putnam

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 35 employers in Putnam, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KVF Quad Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ingham's Regrooving Service 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc Richmond 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectra Metal Sales Inc Atlanta (6104) CC:700 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greater New Haven WPCA 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority - Administrative Bldg. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Nutmeg Companies, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaFramboise Well Drilling, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Day Kimball Hospital 968 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1980 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1980 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Staples FC 472 Putnam CT 210 FTE
NAT-TCR Sumitomo Machinery Corp of America Lufkin 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MAM LLC dba Mid America Specialty Services 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Coffee Cotton Gin Co., Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Crismon 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE East TN Iron & Metal Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Newman, INC. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nuovo Pasta Productions, Ltd. - Cleveland 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stephenson Equipment Inc - Butler 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.