Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Arizona
New Harquahala Generating Company
Tonopah, AZ · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 2.1
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
New Harquahala Generating Company runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade D.
New Harquahala Generating Company: 2.1 TCR = 178% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)
New Harquahala Generating Company safety composite
New Harquahala Generating Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
51/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 2.13 per 100 workers
Safer than 33% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 71% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−2.9
2016→2023
New Harquahala Generating Company injury rate improved
New Harquahala Generating Company's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=2.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221112 · Tonopah, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 178% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #10/13
- PHOTO EW Brown Plant
- BOOK 4y book
- INJ 3 inj
- SIZE ~27 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: EW Brown Plant (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →
New Harquahala Generating Company in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
New Harquahala Generating Company
2.1 TCR
- EW Brown Plant
EW Brown Plant
2.1 TCR
- AES Puerto Ric
AES Puerto Rico
2.1 TCR
- Hayden Station
Hayden Station-948
2.1 TCR
- Merrimack Stat
Merrimack Station
2.1 TCR
What this shows New Harquahala Generating Company averages 2.1 TCR (178% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).
New Harquahala Generating Company TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2
Where New Harquahala Generating Company falls in its industry
846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishmentsSafer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.
Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 13 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Arizona.
New Harquahala Generating Company has fewer employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 5.7 | 2.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221112 · AZ · Tonopah
846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 13 employers in Tonopah, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | EW Brown Plant | 2.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | AES Puerto Rico | 2.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Hayden Station-948 | 2.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Merrimack Station | 2.1 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | TONOPAH BARNS | 27 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | SEMCO SOUTH COOLING | 27 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Shop and Warehouse | 27 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | EPCOR Chaparral City Water, EPCOR Paradise Valley Water | 27 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station | 2,816 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Palo Verde Generating Station | 2,446 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant | 2,150 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Palo Verde Nuclear Plant | 468 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Pallet Recovery, Inc | 2.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Unique Industries - Blairs | 2.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Thorne research - Trade center | 2.1 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Corp-MTUSA | 2.1 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Rotom Inc. dba I.M.S. | 27 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | SE Systems, Inc. Greensboro | 27 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | RMX Freight Systems | 27 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Nedderman & Associates, Inc | 27 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.