Mental health facilities, residential · Utah

New Haven Residential Treatment Center

Spanish Fork, UT · ~200 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Haven Residential Treatment Center runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mental health facilities, residential workplace, earning a grade F.

New Haven Residential Treatment Center: 7.7 TCR = 204% of Mental health facilities, residential BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Haven Residential Treatment Center safety composite

New Haven Residential Treatment Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

New Haven Residential Treatment Center: 4.0 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.73× in 2024

New Haven Residential Treatment Center's TCR rose 6.0 from 4.0 in 2021 to 10.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Spanish Fork, UT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 204% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO Benton Town
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benton Town (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

New Haven Residential Treatment Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Haven Residential Treatment Center averages 7.7 TCR (204% of the Mental health facilities, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Haven Residential Treatment Center TCR series: 2021=4 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.8

Where New Haven Residential Treatment Center falls in its industry

1,165 Mental health facilities, resi establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Mental health facilities, resi employers in Utah.

New Haven Residential Treatment Center (200 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate New Haven Residential Treatment Center
New Haven Residential Treatment Center (200 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

New Haven Residential Treatment Center has more employees than the Mental health facilities, residential median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 5.6 16 0 0
2023 9.7 5.5 14 0 0
2022 7.2 1.4 10 0 0
2021 4.0 3.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · UT · Spanish Fork

1,165 Mental health facilities, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 49 employers in Spanish Fork, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benton Town 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frankfort Terrace 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkside 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MeadowWood Behavioral Health System 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Standard Drywall, Inc. - Salt Lake City UT 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Printing Services 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cedar City West 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laborie Salt Lake City Murray 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunroc Corporation 1,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Young Living Essential Oils - DC 1,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR YLEO Distribution Centers 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nature's Sunshine Manufacturing facility 355 FTE
NAT-TCR Montgomery 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Glen Meadows Retirement 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PHC at Mercy 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bellingham Cold Storage 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 883 - Newport Produce 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE 176 - Conestoga Dr Springfield 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE 155 - Richmond 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sixarp LLC, dba Praxis Packaging Solutions, dba Unette Corporation 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.