Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · Minnesota

New Hope Police Department

New Hope, MN · ~45 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Hope Police Department runs at 455% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade F.

New Hope Police Department: 14.6 TCR = 455% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Hope Police Department safety composite

New Hope Police Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

New Hope Police Department held a steady TCR band

New Hope Police Department's TCR held near 0.2 from 14.6 in 2017 to 14.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 27.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.6 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=15.9 · 2021=20.6 · 2022=27.9 · 2023=14.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · New Hope, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 455% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #55/71
  • PHOTO Plainville Police De…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plainville Police Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

New Hope Police Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Hope Police Department averages 14.6 TCR (455% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Hope Police Department TCR series: 2017=14.6 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=15.9 · 2021=20.6 · 2022=27.9 · 2023=14.8 · BLS 3.2

Where New Hope Police Department falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 71 Police departments (except Ame employers in Minnesota.

New Hope Police Department (45 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate New Hope Police Department
New Hope Police Department (45 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

New Hope Police Department has fewer employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.8 6.3 7 0 0
2022 27.9 23.6 1 12 0
2021 20.6 18.3 2 7 0
2020 15.9 15.9 2 5 0
2019 4.2 2.1 1 1 0
2018 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2017 14.6 9.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · MN · New Hope

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plainville Police Department 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Police 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Police 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Middletown - Police Department 14.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE District 45 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allstar Construction Commercial Op Co, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doran Construction Company, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hasslen Construction Company, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR 161 The Colony 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-01614 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 287197-Stl-Olivette Br 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 054115-Lbc-Carson Br 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kujo, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waterford at College Station 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veritiv Operating Company - IN183 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Veritiv Operating Company - OH245 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.