Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

New Horizons Marlborough

Woburn, MA · ~173 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Horizons Marlborough runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

New Horizons Marlborough: 5.1 TCR = 135% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Horizons Marlborough safety composite

New Horizons Marlborough scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

New Horizons Marlborough: 4.4 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2019

New Horizons Marlborough's TCR rose 1.9 from 4.4 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Woburn, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #68/210
  • PHOTO White Oaks at Spring…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White Oaks at Spring Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

New Horizons Marlborough in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Horizons Marlborough averages 5.1 TCR (135% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Horizons Marlborough TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where New Horizons Marlborough falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

New Horizons Marlborough (173 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate New Horizons Marlborough
New Horizons Marlborough (173 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

New Horizons Marlborough has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.3 2.1 6 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 4 0 0
2017 5.5 4.4 5 0 0
2016 4.4 2.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Woburn

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 187 employers in Woburn, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White Oaks at Spring Street 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OB-OB-ORCHARD BROOKE 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63147 SUNRISE OF BATON ROUGE 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Maple Ridge 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1 Distribution Center Circle, Littleton Ma 01460 - Colonial Systems - corporate offices 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Welch Foods Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPF, Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE EyePoint 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Woburn_MA 1,364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marshalls Woburn Merchants, Inc 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woburn Marshalls Distribution Center 1,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEI Consultants, Inc. 837 FTE
NAT-TCR 6091-SS022 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LakePoint of Augusta 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wendy's Store #199 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dean IL - Rockford 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Detroit Department of Public Works - Street Maintenance Division 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenburnie Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison - 525 Junction Road 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grand Orlando Resort at Celebration 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.