Construction engineering services · New York

New York City Department of Design & Construction

Long Island City, NY · ~1,034 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New York City Department of Design & Construction runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction engineering services workplace, earning a grade D.

New York City Department of Design & Construction: 0.7 TCR = 146% of Construction engineering services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New York City Department of Design & Construction safety composite

New York City Department of Design & Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

New York City Department of Design & Construction held a steady TCR band

New York City Department of Design & Construction's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.7 in 2023 to 0.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.7 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Long Island City, NY ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO B64
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~1,034 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: B64 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

New York City Department of Design & Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New York City Department of Design & Construction averages 0.7 TCR (146% of the Construction engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New York City Department of Design & Construction TCR series: 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 0.5

Where New York City Department of Design & Construction falls in its industry

690 Construction engineering servi establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Construction engineering servi employers in New York.

New York City Department of Design & Construction (1,034 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate New York City Department of Design & Construction
New York City Department of Design & Construction (1,034 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

New York City Department of Design & Construction has more employees than the Construction engineering services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.3 8 0 0
2023 0.7 0.5 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · NY · Long Island City

690 Construction engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 160 employers in Long Island City, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR B64 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ricor Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woolpert- Dayton 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Vista Solutions 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hudson Valley Hospital 1,035 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York Marriott Marquis 1,032 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DNJ3 1,030 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
CITY-NEAR Collins Building Services 3,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Long Island City Facility 2,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR E-J Electric Installation Co. 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Contact Services LLC 998 FTE
NAT-TCR Pactiv 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JBT Machining 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta Flight Products 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-Ohio Pipeline Company Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bedford County Board of Education 1,034 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA San Francisco (1515 3rd St - MB2) 1,034 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gateway Foundation Inc. 1,034 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ruiz Food Products, Inc. 1,034 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.