Bobbins, fiber, made from purchased paperboard · Wisconsin

Newark Paperboard Products

Oshkosh, WI · ~91 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newark Paperboard Products runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bobbins, fiber, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Newark Paperboard Products: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Bobbins, fiber, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newark Paperboard Products safety composite

Newark Paperboard Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Newark Paperboard Products injury rate improved

Newark Paperboard Products's TCR fell 1.5 from 8.7 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Oshkosh, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Tetra Pak Materials …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tetra Pak Materials LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Newark Paperboard Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newark Paperboard Products averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Bobbins, fiber, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newark Paperboard Products TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=6 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=3 · 2022=7.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Newark Paperboard Products falls in its industry

140 Bobbins, fiber, made from purc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Bobbins, fiber, made from purc employers in Wisconsin.

Newark Paperboard Products (91 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Newark Paperboard Products
Newark Paperboard Products (91 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Newark Paperboard Products has more employees than the Bobbins, fiber, made from purchased pape median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.3 3.6 8 0 0
2021 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2019 3.9 1.9 4 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 5 0 0
2017 6.0 4.0 6 0 0
2016 8.7 7.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · WI · Oshkosh

140 Bobbins, fiber, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 206 employers in Oshkosh, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tetra Pak Materials LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mauser USA, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodbine Tube Plant 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armorboard Products LLC 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Construction Co., Inc. WI 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Security-Luebke Roofing Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Technical Center 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigwam Mills 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Medical Center Oshkosh 1,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR Meyer and Sons Co. 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bemis North America - Office 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrison Street 738 FTE
NAT-TCR Price Less Foods #473 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sureway #525 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR INTEGRIS Bass Baptist Health 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 035 Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Alliance 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store #612 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers #118 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Grocers #115 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pallet Service Corp, Maple Grove 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.