Baskets, metal, made from purchased wire · New Jersey

Newark Wire Cloth company

Clifton, NJ · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newark Wire Cloth company runs at 325% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Baskets, metal, made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade F.

Newark Wire Cloth company: 10.7 TCR = 325% of Baskets, metal, made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newark Wire Cloth company safety composite

Newark Wire Cloth company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2017→2022

Newark Wire Cloth company injury rate improved

Newark Wire Cloth company's TCR fell 7.4 from 15.8 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.8 · 2018=12.5 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=12.5 · 2022=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Clifton, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 325% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO Alabama Wire Products
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alabama Wire Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Newark Wire Cloth company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newark Wire Cloth company averages 10.7 TCR (325% of the Baskets, metal, made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newark Wire Cloth company TCR series: 2017=15.8 · 2018=12.5 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=12.5 · 2022=8.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Newark Wire Cloth company falls in its industry

270 Baskets, metal, made from purc establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Baskets, metal, made from purc employers in New Jersey.

Newark Wire Cloth company (29 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Newark Wire Cloth company
Newark Wire Cloth company (29 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Newark Wire Cloth company has fewer employees than the Baskets, metal, made from purchased wire median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.4 0.0 2 0 0
2021 12.5 4.2 3 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 11.7 7.8 3 0 0
2018 12.5 4.2 3 0 0
2017 15.8 4.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · NJ · Clifton

270 Baskets, metal, made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 99 employers in Clifton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alabama Wire Products 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulare Warehouse - Langston Companies Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelco Industries 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR G3 Industries, Inc. 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRP Services Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Construction Group Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renda Roads, Inc. 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMAC Communications Inc 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris 1,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clifton NJ 1,300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Space and Airborne Systems : NJ, Clifton - 77 River Rd. 1,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1822 - Clifton 378 FTE
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02175 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02212 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Disposal Model City 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 415244-Meadville Po 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alumisource Corporation- Richmond 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-Ea-Grk-Kileen - Fort Hood-Grk-Trml 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-EA-GSO-GREENSBORO-GSO-TRML 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-EA-LBB-LUBBOCK-LBB-TRML 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.