Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing · California

Newby Rubber, Inc.

Bakersfield, CA · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newby Rubber, Inc. runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Newby Rubber, Inc.: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newby Rubber, Inc. safety composite

Newby Rubber, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2024

Newby Rubber, Inc. injury rate improved

Newby Rubber, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Bakersfield, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/18
  • PHOTO DAWSON MANUFACTURING…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAWSON MANUFACTURING CO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Newby Rubber, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newby Rubber, Inc. averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newby Rubber, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Newby Rubber, Inc. falls in its industry

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e. employers in California.

Newby Rubber, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Newby Rubber, Inc.
Newby Rubber, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Newby Rubber, Inc. has fewer employees than the Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extrude median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · CA · Bakersfield

266 Rubber goods, mechanical (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAWSON MANUFACTURING CO 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flexmag Industries 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greene Rubber 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR JMEG, LLC - Austin 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Facility Solutions Group, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Airspan Networks Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hodge Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE coin division 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indian Trail, Nc Branch 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Wareham 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tsi Calera 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.