Electric Power Distribution · North Carolina

Newell Operations Center

Charlotte, NC · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newell Operations Center runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Newell Operations Center: 2.0 TCR = 163% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newell Operations Center safety composite

Newell Operations Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Newell Operations Center injury rate improved

Newell Operations Center's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/107
  • PHOTO CoServ Elecrtic
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CoServ Elecrtic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Newell Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newell Operations Center averages 2.0 TCR (163% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newell Operations Center TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=5 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Newell Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 107 Electric Power Distribution employers in North Carolina.

Newell Operations Center (65 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Newell Operations Center
Newell Operations Center (65 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Newell Operations Center has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 4.7 1.6 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NC · Charlotte

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CoServ Elecrtic 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bluefield WV Svc Ctr 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodyear Service Center 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy Lafayette 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE AgMart Produce, Inc. LELAND, NC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Kinston Hatchery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayo Fossil Plant 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guaranteed Supply Company 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Hoc Transport 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 227 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BioTek America,LLC - White Settlement,TX dba Freedom Plasma 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR C A Rasmussen, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mulberry Gardens Memory Care 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerr Management Company 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Active Transportation Services 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowlin Group LLC 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.