Extracts, food (except coffee, meat), manufacturing · California

Newport Flavors & Fragrances

Orange, CA · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newport Flavors & Fragrances runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Extracts, food (except coffee, meat), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Newport Flavors & Fragrances: 0.7 TCR = 17% of Extracts, food (except coffee, meat), manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newport Flavors & Fragrances safety composite

Newport Flavors & Fragrances scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Newport Flavors & Fragrances held a steady TCR band

Newport Flavors & Fragrances's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311942 · Orange, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO Morton Salt - South …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morton Salt - South Hutchinson, KS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Newport Flavors & Fragrances in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newport Flavors & Fragrances averages 0.7 TCR (17% of the Extracts, food (except coffee, meat), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newport Flavors & Fragrances TCR series: 2017=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Newport Flavors & Fragrances falls in its industry

200 Extracts, food (except coffee, establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 Extracts, food (except coffee, employers in California.

Newport Flavors & Fragrances (33 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Newport Flavors & Fragrances
Newport Flavors & Fragrances (33 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Newport Flavors & Fragrances has fewer employees than the Extracts, food (except coffee, meat), ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311942 · CA · Orange

200 Extracts, food (except coffee, meat), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 319 employers in Orange, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morton Salt - South Hutchinson, KS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle LJ Minor 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kerry Red Arrow Expo 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mojave Foods 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine Health 6,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC - CHildren's Hospital of Orange County 4,962 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange 3,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHOC Children's Orange V2 3,652 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Medical University Hospital 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Al - Basf 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USA PA Pittsburgh Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sealed Air Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rock Hill Trucking Co., Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayton 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE G3 Enterprises, Inc. - Chicago Regional Distribution Center 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Management The Glenn Hopkins Towers 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.