Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing · Minnesota

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales

Worthington, MN · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales safety composite

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales held a steady TCR band

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325414 · Worthington, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO Takeda: Bannockburn
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Takeda: Bannockburn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales falls in its industry

234 Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vac establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vac employers in Minnesota.

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales
Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Newport Laboratories Administration/Sales has fewer employees than the Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325414 · MN · Worthington

234 Bacterins (i.e., bacterial vaccines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 59 employers in Worthington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Takeda: Bannockburn 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Biogen - Weston 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Denali Therapeutics 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shire: 95 Hayden 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY - WORTHINGTON 2,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWIFT PORK COMPANY WORTHINGTON 2,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford Industries 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN,WORTHINGTON - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 272 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanes Geo 8681 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE CN - Paoli 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dfs Sacramento 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3097 Keystone 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.