Natural gas processing plant construction · Texas

NG Field Construction

Midland, TX · ~121 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NG Field Construction runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Natural gas processing plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

NG Field Construction: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Natural gas processing plant construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NG Field Construction safety composite

NG Field Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

NG Field Construction injury rate improved

NG Field Construction's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #132/216
  • PHOTO Excel Contractors at…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Excel Contractors at CF Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

NG Field Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NG Field Construction averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Natural gas processing plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NG Field Construction TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where NG Field Construction falls in its industry

809 Natural gas processing plant c establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #132 safest of 216 Natural gas processing plant c employers in Texas.

NG Field Construction (121 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate NG Field Construction
NG Field Construction (121 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

NG Field Construction has fewer employees than the Natural gas processing plant constructio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2018 0.5 0.2 3 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · TX · Midland

809 Natural gas processing plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Excel Contractors at CF Industries 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snelson Companies, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pipeline Systems Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Valero St. Charles 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pittsburg Complex 1 and 2 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allen Keller Co 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stratum Reservoir, LLC -5200 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookglen 6422 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR DiMarco Constructors 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BorgWarner Propulsion Technical Center 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Sullivan and Cromwell LLP Cafe 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR American-Iowa Manufacturing, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE DoubleTree by Hilton Denver 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nassal Fabrication Services 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE TAG Shelby Operating, LLC 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.