Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance · Kansas

NGTS-X975

Topeka, KS · ~191 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NGTS-X975 runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance workplace, earning a grade C.

NGTS-X975: 2.4 TCR = 115% of Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NGTS-X975 safety composite

NGTS-X975 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NGTS-X975 held a steady TCR band

NGTS-X975's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.1 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Topeka, KS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 115% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #16/47
  • PHOTO CFM-FL-SEG
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CFM-FL-SEG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

NGTS-X975 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NGTS-X975 averages 2.4 TCR (115% of the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NGTS-X975 TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2 · BLS 2.1

Where NGTS-X975 falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Mach establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 47 Commercial and Industrial Mach employers in Kansas.

NGTS-X975 (191 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NGTS-X975
NGTS-X975 (191 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

NGTS-X975 has more employees than the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.0 2.0 4 0 0
2018 3.1 2.6 6 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · KS · Topeka

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 319 employers in Topeka, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CFM-FL-SEG 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hussmann Services Corporation - DFW 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blackhawk Equipment Company 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altorfer Inc. - Springfield, IL - 4949 International Parkway 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Topeka Operations Center 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&M Manufacturing 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE 599 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Cedars, Inc. 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stormont Vail Health - Hospital 2,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire Rubber Company 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Topeka 1,499 FTE
CITY-NEAR The University of Kansas Health System St. Francis Campus 1,417 FTE
NAT-TCR Byron - 124 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Transfer & Storage Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Construction - MWC-Paramount 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 329 - New Albany-OH 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises, LLC 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Borbon Inc 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avalign Instruments and Implants 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Sands General Contractors, Inc. 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.