Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing · California

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate

Ontario, CA · ~894 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate safety composite

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate held a steady TCR band

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312112 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/31
  • PHOTO Nestle Waters Greenw…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~894 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nestle Waters Greenwood Indiana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate falls in its industry

192 Beverages, naturally carbonate establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 31 Beverages, naturally carbonate employers in California.

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate (894 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate
Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate (894 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Niagara Bottling, LLC - Corporate has more employees than the Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.2 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312112 · CA · Ontario

192 Beverages, naturally carbonated bottled water, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nestle Waters Greenwood Indiana 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CForce Bottling Company 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Salt Lake City 2 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allentown West (405) 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orange County/Los Angeles 894 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chevron SJV Headquarters 894 FTE
STATE-SIZE Control Air Enterprises LLC 893 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alere 893 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Village at Pennwood 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NOV Houston Rig Pressure Control WLY 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Corp Off-One Energy Place 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SSAB Enterprises Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Club Car : MFG-Augusta, GA-USA 894 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Park (Gafpa) 894 FTE
NAT-SIZE MultiCare Allenmore Hospital (Company 25) 894 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horseshoe Bossier City Hotel & Casino 894 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.