Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · New York

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp

Lancaster, NY · ~41 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp: 3.5 TCR = 126% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp safety composite

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2017

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp injury rate improved

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.9 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Lancaster, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 126% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #101/165
  • PHOTO Ranger Construction_…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ranger Construction_Winter Garden (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp averages 3.5 TCR (126% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 165 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in New York.

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp (41 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp
Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp (41 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Nichols Long and Moore Construction Corp has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NY · Lancaster

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 83 employers in Lancaster, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ranger Construction_Winter Garden 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pitlik & Wick, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlsbad 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4503 - Atlanta, GA 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAKESIDE ORCHARDS INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martens Fresh, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steam Distribution System 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAKWOOD AVENUE CREW LOCATION-NY14 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF5 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erie Logistics 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF9 665 FTE
NAT-TCR SC420 - Nashville 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond (Vampk) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Iah Gateway (Txiah) 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Clairsville (Ohstc) 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Fayette Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of East Prairie Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Advance Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cycle Chem Inc. Elizabeth TSDF 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.