Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Utah

Nielson Construction

Huntington, UT · ~150 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nielson Construction runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Nielson Construction: 1.7 TCR = 60% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nielson Construction safety composite

Nielson Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2024

Nielson Construction injury rate improved

Nielson Construction's TCR fell 3.7 from 4.5 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.5 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Huntington, UT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #12/33
  • PHOTO Kokosing Constructio…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kokosing Construction Company, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Nielson Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nielson Construction averages 1.7 TCR (60% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nielson Construction TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=3 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Nielson Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 33 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Utah.

Nielson Construction (150 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Nielson Construction
Nielson Construction (150 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Nielson Construction has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.5 0.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 3.0 1.8 5 0 0
2017 4.5 1.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · UT · Huntington

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kokosing Construction Company, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foundation Steel, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blankenberger Brothers, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mar Jim Contracting LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE E-Green Exterior Solutions 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0342 LOWE S OF MURRAY UT. 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2662 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS-0017-0016-01329 FAC-01329-SAINT GEORGE-UT 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR 00518 HUNTINGTON PLANT 128 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper, Mt Carmel, PA 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Blankenberger Brothers, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crocker Electrical Co., Inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kpr U.S., LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kokomo Family YMCA 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMLightHouse926 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop Rite of Old Bridge 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tweezerman International, LLC 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.