Glass packaging containers manufacturing · Virginia

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant

Clarksville, VA · ~71 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Glass packaging containers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Glass packaging containers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant safety composite

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2017

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327213 · Clarksville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Newell Brands Fishers
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newell Brands Fishers (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Glass packaging containers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant falls in its industry

98 Glass packaging containers man establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Glass packaging containers man employers in Virginia.

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant (71 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant
Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant (71 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Nipro PharmaPackaging Chase City Vial Plant has fewer employees than the Glass packaging containers manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327213 · VA · Clarksville

98 Glass packaging containers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 7 employers in Clarksville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newell Brands Fishers 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owens-Brockway Glass Container - Brockway Plant 18 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newell Brands - Fishers 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glastron Inc 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE REC - Blue Ridge 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE WVWA Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Plant 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104399 - WMATA 4 Orange / Silver Line 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martins Construction Corp. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sentara Meadowview Terrace 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clarksville Health & Rehab 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02620 - STORE # 2620 CLARKSVILLE 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2620 77 FTE
NAT-TCR TC091 - Orlando FL 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Riser Foods Corporate 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - CHAA 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ZWOLLE 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garden City Container 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Hampshire Location #09 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philips Lighting Mountain Top RDC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kincaid Ready Mix 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.