Medicinal chemicals, uncompounded, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155

Milford, MA · ~238 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Medicinal chemicals, uncompounded, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Medicinal chemicals, uncompounded, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 safety composite

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2022→2024

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 injury rate improved

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155's TCR fell 2.9 from 3.5 in 2022 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.5 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325411 · Milford, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Quicksilver Scientific
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~238 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quicksilver Scientific (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Medicinal chemicals, uncompounded, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 TCR series: 2022=3.5 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 falls in its industry

260 Medicinal chemicals, uncompoun establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Medicinal chemicals, uncompoun employers in Massachusetts.

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 (238 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155
Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 (238 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Nitto Avecia Milford Bldg. 155 has more employees than the Medicinal chemicals, uncompounded, manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 4 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325411 · MA · Milford

260 Medicinal chemicals, uncompounded, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 71 employers in Milford, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quicksilver Scientific 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jetpack Shipping - Akron Saalfield 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6319-020052 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RiverRock LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marlborough - Simarano Drive 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Square One 226 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Bridgewater Medical Investors Limited Partnership d/b/d Life Care Center of West Bridgewater 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Western MA 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waters- Milford 2,393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waters Corporation Milford, MA and Field 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRMC 1,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Consigli Construction Company, Inc. 1,686 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Rebar Tracy 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion Jr. High School 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardeeville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Union Electric Contracting Company Merck Establishment 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Aquarium 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Geneva Park District 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsons Government Center - General Government 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04160 - Irvine Hauling 238 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.