Millwrights · California

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial

Sacramento, CA · ~104 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Millwrights workplace, earning a grade C.

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial: 2.3 TCR = 82% of Millwrights BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial safety composite

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2017→2024

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial injury rate improved

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #53/85
  • PHOTO 400-Dallas
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 400-Dallas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial averages 2.3 TCR (82% of the Millwrights BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=7 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial falls in its industry

1,138 Millwrights establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 85 Millwrights employers in California.

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial (104 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial
NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial (104 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

NMI Industrial Holdings Inc DBA NMI Industrial has more employees than the Millwrights median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2022 7.0 5.9 6 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2017 3.0 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · CA · Sacramento

1,138 Millwrights employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 400-Dallas 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LODIGE USA INC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Roanoke 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barr Field Service, LLC 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE farm management inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Farms LP 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Dairy L.P 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veg-Land, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Kpr Us, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Shoals 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S03930 - Southern Sanitation 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S05205 - Lansing Hauling 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Austin Public Schools ISD#492-Ellis Middle School 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0156 Olympia 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #10 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04193 - WM of Utah West Jordan 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.