Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · Texas

Nobis Technology, LLC

Cedar Creek, TX · ~48 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nobis Technology, LLC runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Nobis Technology, LLC: 1.9 TCR = 68% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nobis Technology, LLC safety composite

Nobis Technology, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nobis Technology, LLC: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 3.01× in 2024

Nobis Technology, LLC's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 5.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Cedar Creek, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 68% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #208/424
  • PHOTO Pieper Houston Elect…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pieper Houston Electric, LP - Main Office - All Projects (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Nobis Technology, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nobis Technology, LLC averages 1.9 TCR (68% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nobis Technology, LLC TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Nobis Technology, LLC falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 424 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Texas.

Nobis Technology, LLC (48 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nobis Technology, LLC
Nobis Technology, LLC (48 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Nobis Technology, LLC has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · TX · Cedar Creek

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 6 employers in Cedar Creek, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pieper Houston Electric, LP - Main Office - All Projects 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TONY MILLER ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION, INC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Geary Electric Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE SAN ANTONIO SOD FARM 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPPORT SERVICES 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kempenaar Dairy LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Creek 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4MC Enterprises, LLC 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR TCS Mechanical, LLC 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bastrop Energy Center 25 FTE
NAT-TCR 476 Sxb19 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 08013-08-08-FRESNO 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Western N - IL Electric Ops 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trumbull Industries Inc MDC 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vopak Terminal Los Angeles Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hajoca 571 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oaks at Pooler 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville Ky - 080 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.