Furniture (except drafting tables, hospital beds, medical furniture) merchant wholesalers · California

Noble House - Ontario

Ontario, CA · ~163 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Noble House - Ontario runs at 427% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Furniture (except drafting tables, hospital beds, medical furniture) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Noble House - Ontario: 9.4 TCR = 427% of Furniture (except drafting tables, hospital beds, medical furniture) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Noble House - Ontario safety composite

Noble House - Ontario scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.3

2019→2020

Noble House - Ontario injury rate improved

Noble House - Ontario's TCR fell 12.3 from 15.5 in 2019 to 3.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=15.5 · 2020=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423210 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 427% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #96/131
  • PHOTO 4769-6131-POTTERY BARN
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4769-6131-POTTERY BARN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Noble House - Ontario in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Noble House - Ontario averages 9.4 TCR (427% of the Furniture (except drafting tables, hospital beds, medical furniture) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Noble House - Ontario TCR series: 2019=15.5 · 2020=3.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Noble House - Ontario falls in its industry

638 Furniture (except drafting tab establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 131 Furniture (except drafting tab employers in California.

Noble House - Ontario (163 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Noble House - Ontario
Noble House - Ontario (163 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Noble House - Ontario has more employees than the Furniture (except drafting tables, hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.3 1.9 5 0 0
2019 15.5 15.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423210 · CA · Ontario

638 Furniture (except drafting tables, hospital beds, medical furniture) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4769-6131-POTTERY BARN 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 718-WILLIAMS SONOMA WS SOMERSET COLLECTION 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4769-6197-WEST ELM 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6325-POTTERY BARN ANNAPOLIS TOWN CENTRE 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andersen & Sons Shelling 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hughson Nut, Inc - Livingston Facility 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE CORONADO LABOR CONTRACTING, Inc. 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Coleman Industries 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Town & Country Supermarket 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chase Memorial Nursing Home 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0181 - Miami Lakes Fl Whse 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sycamore Glen Health Center 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott central park 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4558-Mondelez 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Services - New York City Janitorial Route 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.