Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Indiana

Noble Industries, Inc.

Noblesville, IN · ~98 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Noble Industries, Inc. runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Noble Industries, Inc.: 6.5 TCR = 198% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Noble Industries, Inc. safety composite

Noble Industries, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Noble Industries, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Noble Industries, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 6.5 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Noblesville, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 198% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #26/35
  • PHOTO Villara-Sacramento
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villara-Sacramento (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Noble Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Noble Industries, Inc. averages 6.5 TCR (198% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Noble Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=7 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=4 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Noble Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 35 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Indiana.

Noble Industries, Inc. (98 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Noble Industries, Inc.
Noble Industries, Inc. (98 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Noble Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 3.4 6 0 0
2023 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2022 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2021 7.4 5.9 10 0 0
2020 7.0 5.0 6 1 0
2019 7.9 6.8 7 0 0
2018 6.6 4.1 8 0 0
2017 9.1 6.0 9 0 0
2016 6.5 3.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · IN · Noblesville

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 93 employers in Noblesville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villara-Sacramento 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S&W Metal Product Partners LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR State Steel of Nebraska 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 6-Lake Air 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Logansport Utilites 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pemberton Davis Electric 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Beverage Marketers 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE House of Fara, Inc 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverview Health 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton County 1,023 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMC Corporation of America 933 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indianpolis 814 FTE
NAT-TCR 001-FF01-Onalaska 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mamaroneck 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mental Health Association in Ulster County, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1 Spectacle Street 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stock Mfg. & Design 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canonsburg Shop 'n Save 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holyoke - 40 Bobala Road 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE BEN 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.