Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Noble Vineyard Management

Ukiah, CA · ~113 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Noble Vineyard Management runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade F.

Noble Vineyard Management: 9.5 TCR = 212% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Noble Vineyard Management safety composite

Noble Vineyard Management scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2021

Noble Vineyard Management injury rate improved

Noble Vineyard Management's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.9 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.9 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Ukiah, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 212% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #544/620
  • PHOTO HarvestCo, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HarvestCo, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Noble Vineyard Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Noble Vineyard Management averages 9.5 TCR (212% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Noble Vineyard Management TCR series: 2017=4.9 · 2018=11.8 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=4.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Noble Vineyard Management falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #544 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Noble Vineyard Management (113 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Noble Vineyard Management
Noble Vineyard Management (113 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Noble Vineyard Management has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.6 3.7 5 0 0
2020 15.3 15.3 16 1 0
2019 11.1 6.0 10 3 0
2018 11.8 6.4 11 0 0
2017 4.9 1.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Ukiah

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 67 employers in Ukiah, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HarvestCo, Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HARTNELL PACKING 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PICK, PACK & HAUL, INC 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flanagan and Jones, LLC 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE OSR Enterprises, Inc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE 33150 Pond Rd, Delano CA 93215 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Harvest Berry Farms 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE MARTIN LOERA MEDINA 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 445 738 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 599 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redwood Community Services, INC. 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mendocino Forest Products 240 FTE
NAT-TCR Precise 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hh194-194-Home Health Anoka 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Illing Company-Doraville 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Swire Coca-Cola of Showlow 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE A. Zerega's Sons Inc. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ben E Keith Corporate Office 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilchrist & Soames Plainfield, IN 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversiified Thermal, Inc. 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.