Architectural metalwork manufacturing · Louisiana

NonStop Scaffolding

Shreveport, LA · ~20 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NonStop Scaffolding runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural metalwork manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

NonStop Scaffolding: 9.5 TCR = 288% of Architectural metalwork manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NonStop Scaffolding safety composite

NonStop Scaffolding scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.2

2017→2024

NonStop Scaffolding injury rate improved

NonStop Scaffolding's TCR fell 13.2 from 13.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 26.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.2 · 2018=23.6 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=26.2 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332323 · Shreveport, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 288% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Tig Tech, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tig Tech, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

NonStop Scaffolding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NonStop Scaffolding averages 9.5 TCR (288% of the Architectural metalwork manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NonStop Scaffolding TCR series: 2017=13.2 · 2018=23.6 · 2019=5 · 2020=26.2 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where NonStop Scaffolding falls in its industry

309 Architectural metalwork manufa establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Architectural metalwork manufa employers in Louisiana.

NonStop Scaffolding (20 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NonStop Scaffolding
NonStop Scaffolding (20 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.1

NonStop Scaffolding has fewer employees than the Architectural metalwork manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.1 8.1 1 0 0
2020 26.2 13.1 4 0 0
2019 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 23.6 14.1 5 0 0
2017 13.2 8.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332323 · LA · Shreveport

309 Architectural metalwork manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tig Tech, Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Fabricating Group 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big C Steel, Inc. 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Iron Inc. 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plaq Frac Plant 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Island Services - PWE 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Lockport 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Terrebonne 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR Pick, Pack & Haul, Inc 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Huber Action Freight 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Qualex Manchining LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PDF Print Communications, Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Howard Lake Store 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nelson Staffing - Santa Rosa 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Technology Manufacturing Co 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dyco Industries Inc 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.