Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers except Bulk Stations and Terminals · Nebraska

Norfolk

Norfolk, NE · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Norfolk runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers except Bulk Stations and Terminals workplace, earning a grade D.

Norfolk: 4.0 TCR = 184% of Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers except Bulk Stations and Terminals BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Norfolk safety composite

Norfolk scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Norfolk: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Norfolk's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424720 · Norfolk, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO EVCO Petroleum
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EVCO Petroleum (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Norfolk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Norfolk averages 4.0 TCR (184% of the Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers except Bulk Stations and Terminals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Norfolk TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Norfolk falls in its industry

218 Petroleum and Petroleum Produc establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Petroleum and Petroleum Produc employers in Nebraska.

Norfolk (33 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Norfolk
Norfolk (33 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Norfolk has fewer employees than the Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 13.3 3.3 4 0 0
2022 7.1 3.5 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424720 · NE · Norfolk

218 Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers except Bulk Stations and Terminals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 87 employers in Norfolk, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EVCO Petroleum 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highline Warren Council Bluffs DC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santie's Wholesale Oil Co 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shortway Services 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FORT KEARNY CONSOLIDATED 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Double D 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kearney - Sampson Construction 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linhart Construction, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faith Regional Health Services West Campus 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel Nebraska 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR AWG, Norfolk 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vulcraft Nebraska 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Singer Equipment Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Scaffolding Incorporated 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Paperchef 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Concord 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hughes Exterminators 3012 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators 1006 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cotton O'Neil Croco Clinic 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Portland 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.