Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Norgren Automation Solutions

Saline, MI · ~97 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Norgren Automation Solutions runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Norgren Automation Solutions: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Norgren Automation Solutions safety composite

Norgren Automation Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Norgren Automation Solutions injury rate improved

Norgren Automation Solutions's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Saline, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/50
  • PHOTO EST Group
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EST Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Norgren Automation Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Norgren Automation Solutions averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Norgren Automation Solutions TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Norgren Automation Solutions falls in its industry

827 Tubing, flexible metal, manufa establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 50 Tubing, flexible metal, manufa employers in Michigan.

Norgren Automation Solutions (97 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Norgren Automation Solutions
Norgren Automation Solutions (97 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Norgren Automation Solutions has more employees than the Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.4 2.7 4 1 0
2016 1.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · MI · Saline

827 Tubing, flexible metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 38 employers in Saline, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EST Group 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORBIS MES 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florence Corporation - Manhattan KS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DWM Holdings 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Lean Pork/Huron Pork 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cargill Hersey Michigan 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Headquarters 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wm. R. Curtis 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faurecia Interior Systems Saline LLC 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR JAC Products Inc. Saline Manufacturing 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTR FOR FORENSIC PSYCH - DHHS 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5472 355 FTE
NAT-TCR LoJac LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR El Dorado Service Center 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR John R. Stinson & Sons Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR STR0266 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Family of Caring at Tenafly 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 110 Mid Rivers 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 133 Chesterfield 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 144 Fairview 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.