General Warehousing and Storage · Indiana

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8

Indianapolis, IN · ~2,192 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8: 6.1 TCR = 105% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 held a steady TCR band

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8's TCR held near 0.0 from 5.0 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.0 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 105% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #296/366
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 175 inj
  • SIZE ~2,192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - TEB9 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 averages 6.1 TCR (105% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 TCR series: 2018=5 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=5 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #296 safest of 366 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Indiana.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 (2,192 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 (2,192 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND8 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.0 4.8 101 4 0
2019 8.2 6.3 71 1 0
2018 5.0 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Indianapolis

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEB9 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC2 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00017W HARTFORD REGION 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAT3 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana University Health University Hospital 2,188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana University Health Bloomington Hospital 2,173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake County Government 2,157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lutheran Hospital of Ft Wayne Indiana 2,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR 1072-CMC Home Care - Lincoln 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 0406 - Windows-Stayton 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Midtown Atlanta 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison Mill 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Emerald Queen Hotel & Casinos 2,193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DAL2 2,193 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-MDBAL19 2,194 FTE
NAT-SIZE HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.