General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9

Edison, NJ · ~2,437 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9: 3.0 TCR = 51% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.5 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Edison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 51% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #135/333
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 210 inj
  • SIZE ~2,437 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - SOH3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 averages 3.0 TCR (51% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 (2,437 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 (2,437 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 2.3 72 1 0
2019 2.6 2.4 52 0 0
2018 3.2 2.4 68 0 0
2017 3.5 3.2 18 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Edison

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SOH3 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 19110010-001170 USWHS VEYER-HAMILTON,OH 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building 17 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2807-1449 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-WOOD 2,436 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDTWNJ21 2,433 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ABE8 2,454 FTE
STATE-SIZE Protocall NJ, Inc. NJ HC 2,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-METU 1,517 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : MCI5 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Interface Communications 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR A.W. Hastings & Co., LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR UTC Railcar Repair Services - Waterloo, IA 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thor Motor Coach 2,437 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 2,439 FTE
NAT-SIZE Federal Building Services, Inc. 2,440 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.