General Warehousing and Storage · Illinois

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2

Joliet, IL · ~2,361 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2: 6.7 TCR = 116% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2's TCR fell 2.0 from 7.9 in 2017 to 5.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.9 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Joliet, IL ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 6.7 · 116% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #446/551
  • PHOTO SYNC York Auto
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 506 inj
  • SIZE ~2,361 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SYNC York Auto (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 averages 6.7 TCR (116% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.9 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #446 safest of 551 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Illinois.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 (2,361 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 (2,361 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.9 5.1 125 2 0
2019 4.4 3.6 83 1 0
2018 8.6 7.7 156 0 0
2017 7.9 6.6 142 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IL · Joliet

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 281 employers in Joliet, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SYNC York Auto 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4.24075E+14 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rivian Automotive - West Kerrick 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 86094B01 CVS PHARMACY, INC. 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE COLLEGE OF DUPAGE #502 2,368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center 2,352 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System 2,352 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Air-Ground Ambulance Services Inc. 2,331 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Of Will 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW2 2,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Joliet 2,089 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW4 2,027 FTE
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dse5 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 360 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BTS Equipment Unlimited Inc 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR REN401 Charlotte 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE MS-IL Staffing 2,361 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Hospital Center 2,362 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Design Rv 2,359 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memphis Corporate Offices 2,359 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.