General Warehousing and Storage · Pennsylvania

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6

Carlisle, PA · ~755 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6: 7.8 TCR = 135% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

9/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6: 5.0 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6's TCR rose 5.2 from 5.0 in 2017 to 10.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Carlisle, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 135% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #530/650
  • PHOTO 88391
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 204 inj
  • SIZE ~755 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 88391 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 averages 7.8 TCR (135% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=10.2 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #530 safest of 650 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Pennsylvania.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 (755 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 (755 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PHL6 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 10.2 9.4 66 1 0
2019 11.5 9.9 72 1 0
2018 4.8 4.6 28 0 0
2017 5.0 4.7 38 1 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Carlisle

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 165 employers in Carlisle, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 88391 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCM : 5607-00 TJ Maxx-DCM/Livonia, MI 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx Supply Chain (Wegmans) 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEPW Logistics - South Paris 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE WEXFORD HOSPITAL 755 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maris Grove 755 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barber National Institute - Main Campus-Erie - IHS 755 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Specialty Fulfillment : AVP3 754 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp Office Carlisle PA 1,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR DB Schenker--Carlisle 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCM 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACAS - CARLISLE 902 FTE
NAT-TCR Keystone Plant 701 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 954 Manchester, Nh 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1052 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornerstone Village South - Pine Oaks 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aquatica 755 FTE
NAT-SIZE DDS North Region 755 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-50CC099 755 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056835-San Jose Ca P&Dc 755 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.