General Warehousing and Storage · California

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3

Stockton, CA · ~1,900 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3: 8.7 TCR = 149% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2018→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3's TCR fell 3.2 from 10.4 in 2018 to 7.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.4 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Stockton, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 8.7 · 149% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #917/1131
  • PHOTO 1750 Purina
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 313 inj
  • SIZE ~1,900 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1750 Purina (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 averages 8.7 TCR (149% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 TCR series: 2018=10.4 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=7.1 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #917 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 (1,900 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 (1,900 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SMF3 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.1 5.3 152 7 0
2019 8.4 6.6 123 3 0
2018 10.4 9.6 38 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Stockton

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1750 Purina 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KLS FRITO LAY FL 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenville Parts Distribution Center 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WHSE BSG 6791 POTTSVILLE PA 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 64030341-341001 NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 1,901 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Francisco Baseball Associates 1,898 FTE
STATE-SIZE 64030324-324001 BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 1,903 FTE
STATE-SIZE RNJ Harvesting Inc 1,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Thigpen Livestock,LTD 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Evansville DSH 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland Building Restoration 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ridge Ortho - Anderson 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Txalg - Lone Star 1,900 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flagger Force LLC 1,899 FTE
NAT-SIZE Osborn Medical Ctr Campus 1,898 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-MIDET153 1,903 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.