Distribution of electric power · Arkansas

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem

Salem, AR · ~80 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem: 4.2 TCR = 346% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem safety composite

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem: 1.6 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2024

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem's TCR rose 6.8 from 1.6 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Salem, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.2 · 346% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #34/45
  • PHOTO Miami-Cass REMC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miami-Cass REMC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem averages 4.2 TCR (346% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=0 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=12.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 1.2

Where North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 45 Distribution of electric power employers in Arkansas.

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem (80 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem
North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem (80 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative - Salem has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 3.4 5 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 12.5 8.9 7 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AR · Salem

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 6 employers in Salem, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miami-Cass REMC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oakbrook 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Volunteer Energy Cooperative - Byrdstown 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Petit Jean Electric Cooperative 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Benton County Foods LLC 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley View Agri 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hendren Plastics, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silgan Plastic Food Containers 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fulton County Hospital 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR SLNC, Inc. dba SouthFork River Therapy and Living 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOWN & COUNTRY SUPERMARKET #2320 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Polishing Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-TCR CBF San Francisco 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Jackson 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Applied Textiles, Inc. - North Carolina Location 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wood Health Company LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE store 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Switching Power, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE New YORK HVC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAPEI Corporation 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.